Skip to content

G
go-ipfs
切换分支/标签
  1. 14 5月, 2019 2 次提交
  3. 13 5月, 2019 5 次提交
  5. 11 5月, 2019 2 次提交
  7. 10 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 09 5月, 2019 16 次提交
  11. 08 5月, 2019 3 次提交
  13. 06 5月, 2019 7 次提交
    • Merge pull request #6301 from ipfs/update-license · bfd4ec5c 
      License update to dual MIT and Apache 2
      由 Steven Allen 提交于
    • Update COPYRIGHT · e4214472 
      transitional comments
      由 MollyM 提交于
    • Delete LICENSE · 52aa24d0 
      moving to copyright file
      由 MollyM 提交于
    • add transitional comments · 407a3752 
      described here: https://github.com/ipfs/team-mgmt/issues/849
      由 MollyM 提交于
    • Create LICENSE-APACHE · c1b70030
      由 MollyM 提交于
    • Create COPYRIGHT · 4941b499
      由 MollyM 提交于
    • License update to dual MIT and Apache 2 · 6bd310de 
      This series of commits aims to update go-ipfs to follow a dual-licensing best practice based on research into open-source licensing by @ianjdarrow. He recommends a dual MIT and Apache 2.0 license -

> This has two major benefits:

> - There are concerns in the open source community about whether the MIT license leaves users vulnerable to patent infringement claims. We think the pure legal risk is small, but the way the open source community interacts with our project is really important. It makes sense to pick the license that makes the largest number of people comfortable.
- There's now no reason to adopt a separate DCO, since the Apache-2 license grant addresses the same issue.

> Why use a dual license, instead of just Apache-2? The Apache-2 license is incompatible with the GPLv2 license, which includes things like the Linux kernel. With a dual license, GPLv2 projects can just use the MIT license instead. Our goal is to make our software available to as many projects as possible, so we'd rather adopt a licensing scheme that doesn't exclude anyone.

In addition to these commits, we also need to get an explicit OK from current and past contributors to give their consent to relicensing - which will happen in an issue thread.
      由 MollyM 提交于
  15. 03 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  17. 02 5月, 2019 3 次提交
    • Test Fix: Nil error handling · 5ce2deb5 
      In TestExternalUnmount, the Mount function is called which returns an
error which can be nil. The error type is then used in a comparison
where Error() is called on it. If the error is nil, this results in a
panic.

Added a if err != nil {} guard to make sure that Error() is not called
if the value is nil
 On branch go-test-fix
 Changes to be committed:
	modified:   fuse/node/mount_test.go
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: 's avatarChris Buesser <christopher.buesser@gmail.com>
      由 Christopher Buesser 提交于
    • Test Fix: nil pointer error for core.NewNode · 93806601 
      This commit fixes the errors resulting from passing a nil pointer to the
core.NewNode function in TestExternalUnmmount and setupIpnsTest.

In the previous nil's place a &core.BuildCfg{} is now passed.

Both changes follow the same pattern:

```diff
-  node, err = core.NewNode(context.Background(), nil)
+  node, err = core.NewNode(context.Background(), &core.BuildCfg{})
```

 On branch go-test-fix
 Changes to be committed:
	modified:   fuse/ipns/ipns_test.go
	modified:   fuse/node/mount_test.go
License: MIT
Signed-off-by: 's avatarChris Buesser <christopher.buesser@gmail.com>
      由 Christopher Buesser 提交于
    • Merge pull request #6275 from ipfs/fix/6269-a · 5fd5d444 
      commands(pin update): return resolved CIDs instead of paths
      由 Steven Allen 提交于