1. 21 5月, 2015 6 次提交
  2. 20 5月, 2015 18 次提交
    • remove inflect package · 225b58e3
      Jeromy 提交于
    • Fix: Using the `dnslink` feature led to infinite redirects · 1b379747
      fixes #1233
      Knut Ahlers 提交于
    • fix silent refs failure · 002cf512
      Jeromy 提交于
    • clean up and fix init permissions handling · 8ea502f1
      Jeromy 提交于
    • Merge pull request #1208 from wking/dns-resolver · 01e1e712
      Rework mutable namespace resolution to handle recursion
      Juan Batiz-Benet 提交于
    • namesys/namesys_test: Excercise mpns.ResolveN · ce015d24
      Shifting the generic testResolution helper from the protocol-specific
      dns_test.go to the generic namesys_test.go.
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • namesys/dns: Pluggable lookupTXT field · 1e6594d0
      So we can attach a mock lookup function for testing.
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • core/commands/publish: Fix published message · e4447b3c
      Previously we had a confusing situation, with:
      
      * single-arg doc: published name <name> to <value>
      * double-arg doc: published name <value> to <name>
      * implementation: Published name <name> to <value>
      
      Now we have the uniform:
      
        Published to <name>: <value>
      
      With the following goals:
      
      1. It's clear that we're writing <value> to <name>'s IPNS slot in the
         DHT.
      2. We preserve the order of arguments from the command-line
         invocation:
      
           $ ipfs name publish <name> <value>
           Published to <name>: <value>
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • core/commands: Make 'ipfs name resolve' IPNS-only · 416d454b
      And add a generic 'ipfs resolve' to handle cross-protocol name
      resolution.
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • core/commands/dns: Add 'ipfs dns ...' for resolving DNS references · e643f72c
      This lets users resolve (recursively or not) DNS links without pulling
      in the other protocols.  That makes an easier, more isolated target
      for alternative implemenations, since they don't need to understand
      IPNS, proquint, etc. to handle these resolutions.
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • core/commands/resolve: Add a -r / --recursive option · c2ff0285
      For explicitly enabling recursive behaviour (it was previously always
      enabled).  That allows folks who are interested in understanding
      layered indirection to step through the chain one link at a time.
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • namesys: Add recursive resolution · 3ead2443
      This allows direct access to the earlier protocol-specific Resolve
      implementations.  The guts of each protocol-specific resolver are in
      the internal resolveOnce method, and we've added a new:
      
        ResolveN(ctx, name, depth)
      
      method to the public interface.  There's also:
      
        Resolve(ctx, name)
      
      which wraps ResolveN using DefaultDepthLimit.  The extra API endpoint
      is intended to reduce the likelyhood of clients accidentally calling
      the more dangerous ResolveN with a nonsensically high or infinite
      depth.  On IRC on 2015-05-17, Juan said:
      
      15:34 <jbenet> If 90% of uses is the reduced API with no chance to
        screw it up, that's a huge win.
      15:34 <wking> Why would those 90% not just set depth=0 or depth=1,
        depending on which they need?
      15:34 <jbenet> Because people will start writing `r.Resolve(ctx, name,
        d)` where d is a variable.
      15:35 <wking> And then accidentally set that variable to some huge
        number?
      15:35 <jbenet> Grom experience, i've seen this happen _dozens_ of
        times. people screw trivial things up.
      15:35 <wking> Why won't those same people be using ResolveN?
      15:36 <jbenet> Because almost every example they see will tell them to
        use Resolve(), and they will mostly stay away from ResolveN.
      
      The per-prodocol versions also resolve recursively within their
      protocol.  For example:
      
        DNSResolver.Resolve(ctx, "ipfs.io", 0)
      
      will recursively resolve DNS links until the referenced value is no
      longer a DNS link.
      
      I also renamed the multi-protocol ipfs NameSystem (defined in
      namesys/namesys.go) to 'mpns' (for Multi-Protocol Name System),
      because I wasn't clear on whether IPNS applied to the whole system or
      just to to the DHT-based system.  The new name is unambiguously
      multi-protocol, which is good.  It would be nice to have a distinct
      name for the DHT-based link system.
      
      Now that resolver output is always prefixed with a namespace and
      unprefixed mpns resolver input is interpreted as /ipfs/,
      core/corehttp/ipns_hostname.go can dispense with it's old manual
      /ipfs/ injection.
      
      Now that the Resolver interface handles recursion, we don't need the
      resolveRecurse helper in core/pathresolver.go.  The pathresolver
      cleanup also called for an adjustment to FromSegments to more easily
      get slash-prefixed paths.
      
      Now that recursive resolution with the namesys/namesys.go composite
      resolver always gets you to an /ipfs/... path, there's no need for the
      /ipns/ special case in fuse/ipns/ipns_unix.go.
      
      Now that DNS links can be things other than /ipfs/ or DHT-link
      references (e.g. they could be /ipns/<domain-name> references) I've
      also loosened the ParsePath logic to only attempt multihash validation
      on IPFS paths.  It checks to ensure that other paths have a
      known-protocol prefix, but otherwise leaves them alone.
      
      I also changed some key-stringification from .Pretty() to .String()
      following the potential deprecation mentioned in util/key.go.
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • namesys/dns: Use SplitN to find dnslink references · 04a96983
      RFC 6763 requires printable ASCII except '=' for the key [1], but
      allows any character including '=' in the value [2].  This patch
      adjusts our parsing to avoid splitting on '=' in the value, and then
      ignoring anything after that split.
      
      [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6763#section-6.4
      [2]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6763#section-6.5
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • namesys/interface: Expand package docs to discuss mutable names · 03260a92
      What they are, why you'd use them, and which command-line tools you
      can use to access this functionality.
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • namesys/publisher: Drop the 'namesys: ' prefix for the Publish log · 02cb5f3b
      This is already handled by setup in namesys/routing.go:
      
        var log = u.Logger("namesys")
      W. Trevor King 提交于
    • Merge pull request #1250 from ipfs/test-cat-with-stdin · 71575746
      t0040: add tests for ipfs cat with stdin
      Juan Batiz-Benet 提交于
    • Merge pull request #1251 from ipfs/travis-split-go-sharness · dcd34c6b
      .travis: split go and sharness tests
      Juan Batiz-Benet 提交于
  3. 19 5月, 2015 6 次提交
  4. 18 5月, 2015 7 次提交
  5. 17 5月, 2015 3 次提交